From process to judgement: the case for more top-heavy private equity teams
.
Private equity has always been about more than numbers; it’s about judgement, relationships, and decisive action. Some European firms follow a structured, junior-heavy model inherited from banking and consulting, which focuses on execution capability and brings analytical rigour and depth to the process.

But in today’s mature and competitive market, as AI reshapes much of the traditional junior workload, a key question is emerging: should further senior involvement be the real differentiator in private equity?
The European model: structured and junior-led

Some European firms follow a banking or consulting template, with a wide base of juniors driving analysis and due diligence, and senior committees making the final calls. This approach brings structure, rigour, and the ability to handle complex workloads. At the same time, the layered nature of the model can mean that important decisions are sometimes escalated later in the process.

There is also a natural challenge when much of the initial deal screening falls to less experienced professionals. While juniors bring energy and analytical depth, they may not always have the confidence to identify the 'rough diamond', an opportunity that isn’t neatly packaged by a sell-side advisor. A senior perspective at the front end can complement this, helping firms spot hidden potential earlier, increasing both speed and chances of success.
The US model: entrepreneurial and senior-led

In contrast, some US firms take a more entrepreneurial approach. Often founded by dealmakers rather than bankers, they are typically more top-heavy, with senior professionals engaged at every stage. Their experience and credibility in meetings, often based on real-world operational management exposure, coupled with the ability to make real-time decisions during diligence or negotiations, help them inspire trust and move quickly, advantages that can make the difference in competitive situations.
Why this matters now

Both models have clear strengths. Wide junior benches provide training grounds for future leaders, ensure thorough analysis, and deliver resilience across large portfolios. Senior-led approaches bring speed, credibility, and agility.

But as AI increasingly takes on much of the traditional junior workload, from data analysis to diligence prep, the question becomes sharper: where will the true differentiation come from?
What this means for talent

Firms will need to think carefully about how they structure teams:

  • How can they balance strong junior development with meaningful senior engagement at every stage of the deal?
  • How can mid-level professionals be equipped to transition from execution to true leadership?
  • What will tomorrow’s org chart look like when technology handles much of the number-crunching?

With AI functionality now streamlining diligence workstreams, building models, and even preparing investment committee documents, the profile and skill set of junior team members must extend beyond the traditional Excel-led toolkit to include mastery of AI. More and more clients are actively seeking evidence of these skills in interview processes.
Final thoughts

Private equity is evolving. Juniors will always play a vital role in building skills and delivering thorough analysis, but in a crowded and competitive market, the firms that succeed will be those that strike the right balance between process methodology and the judgement, credibility, and decisive action that proven senior professionals bring to every stage of the investment cycle.
Click below to read Rupert's profile and find his contact details.

Rupert's profile